Attitude

An improvisation of the unified field theory would be to include the abstract entity “attitude” to its theoretical framework and claim that the theory would explain the nature and behavior of not only physical matter, but also abstract matter. It follows laws of conservation like energy and mass. One tends to have more of it while others lack it, giving it the balance. “Attitude is conserved.” It flows from a higher potential to lower potential, like how one would expect any other physical entity should. Or if I could say, it’s an osmosis process. The transfer is governed by concentration gradient. It probably does follow ficks law. The rate of “give” of attitude is directly proportional to the amount of it and probably so is the second derivative. It is obviously hard to keep the spurs from jingling and jangling if there is a gradient. Similar relations it does follow with a chemical reaction. It could be speculated that there exists a minimum energy namely the activation energy, which has to be over come, else u get it back.
So why is the fuss, when someone assumes a fonzy. Attitude and arrogance aint the same ballpark. It is an attitude cycle- someone gives it to you and you give it to someone else and that someone else to another someoneone else and that another someoneelse gives it to that someone who gave it to you. Its existence is ignored when you give it. Inside every brain, there gotto be a whore that is satiated only by actions that bring pride and conceit to it, and satisfaction this way it comes.